“Proving “Dark Plasma” Lifeforms”

On some level, even 'electrons' seem to have a basic sentience is my view, so we are talking about on the quantum level or below.. Now electrons that we generate by spinning magnetic fields past coiled wires (power generation) or via EMF (radio broadcasts) would kill and strip out the potential 'sentience' of the 'electron'. Only natural electrons and ions (like in isolated nature.. for example next to a mountain stream) seem to have interesting properties. Also, I'm not quite sure exactly what these "symbiotes" are composed of (dangling participle). One could say "room temperature cold plasma", but I think that's just one of the layers of their 'body". One…
Read More

Why do “UFOs” Mess with Us, and after 70 Years there is no Proof

My buddy MIrageman on ATS asked me this, and this was my response: "I have definite comments: "Why would something mess with us just occasionally like a plaything?" "Why is there nothing, after 70 years+ that can be considered conclusive proof? " 1. We are play things. 2. I call this the "Star Wars Delusion" or "Delusions of Empire". In short, since most or all "real UAP's" are actually living beings that swarm together.. they do have some characteristics in common with humans.. namely they don't have "one world government / empire" either.. they are bunches of individuals with individual agenda. 3. They seem photophobic, including a possible tie to…
Read More

“Healthy Spirituality” Derives from Quantum Mechanics

Here's the challenge for "spirituality"; It's all rather a side effect of quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, you have strange entanglements. Say you have two particles. They may become 'entangled' (they are linked via one or more properties) until they decohere (their quantum state is messed up by entropy). But in a way, even then, their "history of interaction" is never destroyed.. Each moment of time is "conserved" (as in matter/energy are conserved). The set of properties of these two particles interacting is both temporary and permanent. Both "real" and "seemingly illusory". So our challenge.. Is to not cling to moments in time.. as the properties of those moments are…
Read More

UAP’s, Dripping Metal and EMF

This post is from an ATS post, where I was responding about the Bentwaters incident, and one person's contention that nuclear ordinance had been interfered with, and that iron ore had dripped from a "UFO" in the sky as a result of this interference: "I've heard of molten metal from UAPs being analyzed before.. heck when I talked to Jacques Vallee we discussed one sample he had analyzed. I think that it's generally aluminum alloy. Here is one link for example: www.theavalonfoundation.org... Now I'd been thinking, that if our plasma civilization friends wish to be physically seen and touched, that materializing aluminum is as good a material as anything.. it's…
Read More

Channeling “Masters” and “UFOs”

What amuses me, is that there is no discernible difference in content between "channeled messages" purportedly from "mystic masters" and "UFO collectives". Now one could say that is proof the human imagination is the true source, as both message types are reflective of an uneducated human mind. Or of course there is the possibility that the same sort of "lying lifeforms" are behind both types of messages.. if indeed any lying lifeforms are involved at all. Or both. But in any case, not one single useful 'fact' has ever been conveyed to the human race, either by "channeling" or "divine inspiration" (religion), at least IMHO. If religion, spirituality and "channeling"…
Read More

“UAPs” not “UFOs”

We can't assume "craft". That's one of the first things that Jacques Vallee would say. We also can't assume "angles and demons" or any specific "supernatural type" either. That's actually how little we know about UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena).. many of the best researchers are using that acronym now rather than UFO. The very fact that pretty much ALL the disinformation sources push "craft" and "aliens" down our throats, when there is not one iota of evidence for either, should be all the evidence we need that neither term probably applies. We've had the same strange sightings and "high strangeness" for thousands of years, and just since WWII the mischaracterization…
Read More

The Lie Named “Disclosure”

This is a repost of a reply I made on ATS: "I'm about to repeat myself. There are multiple layers of deception. There is "factual, non-subjective reality" sort of, but we seldom see that. Then there is what the other 96% of the Universe is up to (the Dark Engery/Dark Matter Civilizations). Then there are layers and layers of deluded "insiders" here on Earth. And below that layer, are the occasional mouth-pieces for the deluded insiders that come around and create "useful waves" in our culture. I know that people are fascinated by alphabet agencies and google (refer to the previous) and "insiders" of high tech R&D collectives. So many…
Read More